BST:GPT
ATTENTION PAYERS: STOP RELYING ON SUBJECTIVE DATA
Verify treatment integrity.
Many providers are failing to measure the fidelity of their treatments, resulting in payers funding unnecessary services.
BSTperform partners with Payers to:
-
Get objective treatment fidelity data
-
Improve the quality of services
-
Eliminate paying for excessive services
"I fully endorse a patient-centered approach and believe that accurate service delivery is essential in achieving it. To ensure that our patients receive the best possible care, we must prioritize accuracy and precision in every aspect of our services."
- Tricia Glick, CEO
VALUE BASED CARE INSURERS
LARGE INSURANCE COMPANIES
MEDICAL PLAN PAYERS
Stop paying for unnecessary services.
Improve the quality of services for families and caregivers.
Most providers are not measuring the fidelity of treatments and payers are paying the price.
BSTperform is a Clinical Operations SaaS Platform specifically designed for ABA and Autism providers to demonstrate the quality of care they offer to both clients and payers.
With BSTperform, providers can easily report fidelity data, which gives you confidence in the accuracy of the implementation of their services.
PROVIDER OUTCOMES
90%
40%
Organizational Procedural Integrity Scoring Changes in 6 Months
Require OPI Scoring
Medical and payer decisions are made based on the assumption that the data reported are reasonably accurate and based on the assumption that the prescribed procedures were conducted as specified.
Quality Assurance
Requiring procedural integrity scores, ensures that the autism service organizations you work with provide high-quality services that meet established standards of care. This will improve outcomes for individuals with autism and provide greater peace of mind for the families and caregivers who rely on these services.
Accountability
Requiring procedural integrity scores will help to hold your service providers accountable for their performance. It will provide a straightforward way to measure their effectiveness and identify improvement areas. This will help promote a continuous improvement culture and encourage service providers to strive for excellence in their work.
Cost Savings
Requiring procedural integrity scores promotes high-quality services that will reduce the likelihood of costly interventions and treatments that may be needed if services are ineffective or fail to meet established standards. This can lead to significant cost savings for you and the families you serve.
Compliance
Requiring procedural integrity scores can help you comply with regulations and standards that govern providing services to individuals with autism. By demonstrating that you and your provider network are committed to quality and accountability, you can position yourself as a leader in the industry and gain a competitive advantage.
Require Treatment Fidelity Data
Support Providers Transition to Value-based Care
Organizational Procedural Integrity Task Force
1
REQUIRE FIDELITY DATA FROM PROVIDERS
Pay for outcomes based on treatment fidelity.
3
Support Providers With Tools and Methodology to evaluate quality.
COMMUNICATE GUIDELINES TO PROVIDERS
2
Additional Research
DiGennaro, F. D., Martens, B. K., & Kleinmann, A. E. (2007). A comparison of performance feedback procedures on teachers’ treatment implementation integrity and students’ inappropriate behavior in special education classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 447–461.
Fryling, M. J., Wallace, M. D., & Yassine, J. N. (2012). Impact of treatment integrity on intervention effectiveness. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(2), 449-453. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-449
Nicole C. Groskreutz, Mark P. Groskreutz, Thomas S. Higbee, Effects of varied levels of treatment integrity on appropriate toy manipulation in children with autism, Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, Volume 5, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1358-1369
Sanetti, L. M. H., & Kratchowill, T. R. (2009). Toward developing a science of treatment integrity: Introduction to the special series. School Psychology Review, 38(4), 445-459.
Bergmann, S., Kodak, T., & Harman, M. J. (2021). When do errors in reinforcer delivery affect learning? A parametric analysis of treatment integrity. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 115(2), 561-577.
DiGennaro Reed FD, Reed DD, Baez CN, Maguire H. A parametric analysis of errors of commission during discrete-trial training. J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Fall;44(3):611-5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-611. PMID: 21941391; PMCID: PMC3177342.
Leon, Y., Wilder, D. A., Majdalany, L., Myers, K., & Saini, V. (2014). Errors of Omission and Commission during Alternative Reinforcement of Compliance: The Effects of Varying Levels of Treatment Integrity. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23(1), 19–33.
Vollmer TR, Sloman KN, St Peter Pipkin C. Practical implications of data reliability and treatment integrity monitoring. Behav Anal Pract. 2008 Winter;1(2):4-11. doi: 10.1007/BF03391722. PMID: 22477682; PMCID: PMC2846587.